Re: Isaak’s Grand Though Experimental PMV Blog
-
numsOic

- Joined: May 21, 2011
- Location: Argentina
- Gender: Male
Moderators: Westy543, Geomancing


Isaak wrote:Heh, we'd be getting into censorship alright and I'm genuinely opposed to any form of censorship I can think of.
I already decided on making it, regardless of the swear. Creative freedom and making something great comes first and foremost.




Aramek wrote:Remember when Pinkie Pie was all "Shame on a niggah!" That was something great.
reidransom wrote:Wondering if any of you could give me a little feedback on this thing I've been working on. Here's a short clip from the middle.
Ponyrhythm rough clip
I know my rotobrushing could use some work in places, partly that's bad sources, but I'm pretty busy with research for classes and don't really have much free time to really work on it anyhow. Also I'm pretty hopeless with a lot of this software so there's probably loads of stuff I'm either doing wrong or at least in a really inefficient way. In any case, what do you guys think?







blasmeister wrote:I think they're referring to this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVGI6mhfJyA
Isaak wrote:
Are you using 720p sources? Because it looks like you're scaling your videoclips up from a smaller resolution (480p?) while your still images, the cutiemarks, are sharp.
There's something about that outline... You could clamp down the rotobrush, duplicate the rotobrushed ponies, scale them up, put them on a new layer below, throw in a fill effect in AE and turn that pink or some other colour, maybe even switch between colours to the beat. It would look nice and you would be obscuring any wonky rotobrushing.
There are also black borders at the top and on your right, I think you accidentally moved your frame.
Overall, I like where you're going with this


Concerned Reader wrote:Youtube doesn't really seem to care about cussing ponies.
reidransom wrote:Yeah, I'm using 720p sources, but I think something is happening between importing them into PP to make clips, exporting to AE to rotobrush them out, then rendering back to clips. But I also fuzzed it quite a bit trying to give it a soft focus and obscure some of the wonky rotobrushing, that may be part of it as well. I dunno. I'll give some of that stuff you said a shot, though.





Isaak wrote:
I'm assuming you're rendering everything in lossless avi and at its native resolution between programs, but it may be because you're rendering things at a lower resolution somewhere in your workflow.


reidransom wrote:There is a very strong chance of this. I'm not really sure what the difference is between all the codecs and so on and how they stack up against one another or what losses you incur moving from one to another, so yeah, I should probably pay attention to that and maybe find where I'm messing up. Or maybe I left some things at default settings or whatever.

Isaak wrote:When in doubt, use avi with a lossless codec.
Avi is the file format, or container, which stores the file data. Lossless means the data isn't read by compressing it. A codec is basically a translator which allows programs to render and read a file format. Different formats and codecs allow for different quality to filesize ratios, bits per second, frequencies et cetera.
Because lossless avi is uncompressed it can be read by just about anything, but since there's no compression it's huge: a 1 minute video can easily break 5 gigabytes in size. So you need lots of space.
As another example, If you have .mp3 files there's a fairly big chance they're encoded using the LAME codec. Making the fileformat .mp3 and the codec LAME. Or for instance the .ogg format using the Vorbis codec.
I'm not a wiz with this sorta thing either, though I'll be picking up some things when I reconvert all my H264 encoded .mkv files to .avi. I don't fiddle with codecs or file formats until after rendering my final render.
Concerned Reader wrote:Another thing useful about lossless or uncompressed is that there isn't as much of an encoder overhead taking processing power away from the render, so it will usually render faster.
Maple Leaf wrote:The current go-to lossless codec, as recommended by the SA goons, is Lagarith, just fyi.





ozone wrote:I know I'm late to this, but I just wanted to let you know that making a PMV based off the Star Guitar music video would be the best thing. The first time I saw that video, I didn't even notice that the landscape went with the music until halfway through the video. My reality was completely shattered. Such a great video and a well-made PMV based off it would be even better.

Also, you should just keep the swearing in, we're all grown up around here and Jayson Thiessen even tweeted APPLE.MOV which has plenty of swearing.
Momar wrote:I'd prefer a PMV based off Denmark, but what do I know.

Isaak wrote:
Did that have a video?

Momar wrote:Nope, but it's my favourite track from the album.







oh wait no, crap.
Ragnar34 wrote:I'm sure it'll be done when it's done, though.

Isaak wrote:How about watching me get it done tomorrow on my livestream channel?












Glazius wrote:One of the things with kinetic typography, especially the really rapid-fire stuff, is that it's exploiting the nature of written language as a copy of the verbal sort. The words pop up in time with the pacing of the performance. Seeing a word show up that isn't following the script leads to basically an input channel mismatch along the lines of the Stroop Effect.
And the final crest before the dropoff is a little bit too... gentle? No, that's not the word. When you drop into your color bar "lull" it's from increasingly rapid cuts, and then you come out with more substantive clips. Going back into rapid cuts for the finale just feels like a weaker reprise of what you did earlier, especially since it doesn't last as long. (And I swear, the final shot with all its pinks and purples just made me go "wait, why is this ending on a shot of Twilight?" the first couple times.)
One of the things about Rarity, and something the original song reminded me of when I heard it, is that she's into fashion to make everyone look good - 'everybody's starry-eyed, and everybody glows'. I don't know if you could actually get a good composition from any of the group shots, though.

Wylie wrote:Now I don't miss Rarity not being in today's episode.
Isaak, that was great. I think I like using "pony" as a replacement for "body" in the text- it creates just enough cognitive dissonance to make you almost hear "pony" as it goes by. I'm not sure if that's the effect you were after, but it worked.
Well done, sir.






Momar wrote:I really like the 'textured' feel of the blue-on-white in this video. It was bloody fantastic. I wasn't around for the livestreams, mostly because I didn't want this vid spoilered.
Seriously, fantastic work. I'm glad you saved the best pony for last.

TheLaziestBrony wrote:Haven't been following this thread, but I'm liking the editing in this a lot.
Best pony needs more PMVs.



HuffyTheMagicDragon wrote:Superb. Love how it kept building up. The song was perfect, and for some reason I found it easy to imagine Rarity singing it.
Good luck finding a song that perfect for ol' AJ!


Wylie wrote:Isaak, that was great. I think I like using "pony" as a replacement for "body" in the text- it creates just enough cognitive dissonance to make you almost hear "pony" as it goes by. I'm not sure if that's the effect you were after, but it worked.







