ITT Post Your Random Thoughts
Moderator: Fizzbuzz
- DaikatunaRevengeance
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2019 8:28 am
- Gender: Female
- Location: FLAVATOWN
- DaikatunaRevengeance
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2019 8:28 am
- Gender: Female
- Location: FLAVATOWN
- Inkie
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2017 2:05 pm
- Gender: Female
- Location: Paris
Re: ITT Post Your Random Thoughts
also, remember how SU episode promo arts were sometimes set in an anime high school AU?
the loop is closed
the loop is closed
- DaikatunaRevengeance
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2019 8:28 am
- Gender: Female
- Location: FLAVATOWN
- RIP Syndrome
- i can be yuor angle... or you´re DEBIL
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 6:56 am
- Location: Scunthorpe
Re: ITT Post Your Random Thoughts
LWA is actually v bad
this post and you´re face ™&©20234 R.I.P. Shitpostal Service LLC
for licensing inquiries, please contact , VP of Licensing at R.I.P. Enterprises
~ORIGINAILL COUNTENTEH SINCE 1666 DONTE is good STEEL PLS~
- RIP Syndrome
- i can be yuor angle... or you´re DEBIL
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 6:56 am
- Location: Scunthorpe
Re: ITT Post Your Random Thoughts
it was meant to be ironic my god I still have this avatar people
this post and you´re face ™&©20234 R.I.P. Shitpostal Service LLC
for licensing inquiries, please contact , VP of Licensing at R.I.P. Enterprises
~ORIGINAILL COUNTENTEH SINCE 1666 DONTE is good STEEL PLS~
- Jill
- it's the super maria sisters super show!!!
- Posts: 393
- Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2017 10:59 pm
- Gender: Female
- Contact:
- Mr. Big
- いいんですよ
- Posts: 931
- Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2017 11:00 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Tennessee
- Contact:
Re: ITT Post Your Random Thoughts
So I technically own a book publishing imprint, which I started to publish my webcomics into books.
But lately I realize there are old obscure newspaper strips I enjoy that still has cult following with fans, but no major publishers are interested in reprinting.
I'm thinking, maybe I can go through the hassle of getting the rights (assuming they're cheap enough to obtain) and try my hand at putting out those collections myself. I have a few strips in mind that I want to try out, maybe I'll get lucky...
But lately I realize there are old obscure newspaper strips I enjoy that still has cult following with fans, but no major publishers are interested in reprinting.
I'm thinking, maybe I can go through the hassle of getting the rights (assuming they're cheap enough to obtain) and try my hand at putting out those collections myself. I have a few strips in mind that I want to try out, maybe I'll get lucky...
- DaikatunaRevengeance
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2019 8:28 am
- Gender: Female
- Location: FLAVATOWN
- Mr. Big
- いいんですよ
- Posts: 931
- Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2017 11:00 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Tennessee
- Contact:
Re: ITT Post Your Random Thoughts
Remember how the back cover of "The Giving Tree" has a REALLY terrifying photo of author Shel Silverstein?
Why did they went with that photo? Was that really the least creepy picture they had of him?
Why did they went with that photo? Was that really the least creepy picture they had of him?
- DaikatunaRevengeance
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2019 8:28 am
- Gender: Female
- Location: FLAVATOWN
- Princess Flufflebutt
- Nya
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 2:23 am
- Gender: Female
Re: ITT Post Your Random Thoughts
wow and they say gamers arent oppressed
- DaikatunaRevengeance
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2019 8:28 am
- Gender: Female
- Location: FLAVATOWN
- Princess Flufflebutt
- Nya
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 2:23 am
- Gender: Female
Re: ITT Post Your Random Thoughts
ok you got me there
- Mr. Big
- いいんですよ
- Posts: 931
- Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2017 11:00 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Tennessee
- Contact:
Re: ITT Post Your Random Thoughts
So you know how Bill Watterson complained about how Sunday strips are constrained because they had to be super flexible for newspapers so they can rearrange panels to however they wanted? Specifically, the first row had to be expendable so they can be removed.
Well, there were a TON more ways Sunday strips had to be flexible than the example Watterson showcased. Here's one from Pogo:
Standard three rows. If a paper wanted to, they could've removed the first row entirely.
But what if you wanted to rearrange the panels so it's two WIDE rows? You can! You notice that panel right smack in the middle? Well, you can cut that off and:
That's not all. So, here's an "Arnold" Sunday
You notice that the 1st and 4th panels are exactly the same size? That was intentional. See, some strips did that so you can crop it further like this:
Note that they intentionally wrote the dialogues so you can remove those panels without losing anything.
By making it flexible, newspapers could squeeze in as many strips as they wanted.
You can see why Watterson hated this, right?
Well, there were a TON more ways Sunday strips had to be flexible than the example Watterson showcased. Here's one from Pogo:
Standard three rows. If a paper wanted to, they could've removed the first row entirely.
But what if you wanted to rearrange the panels so it's two WIDE rows? You can! You notice that panel right smack in the middle? Well, you can cut that off and:
That's not all. So, here's an "Arnold" Sunday
You notice that the 1st and 4th panels are exactly the same size? That was intentional. See, some strips did that so you can crop it further like this:
Note that they intentionally wrote the dialogues so you can remove those panels without losing anything.
By making it flexible, newspapers could squeeze in as many strips as they wanted.
You can see why Watterson hated this, right?
- Fizzbuzz
- Posts: 1048
- Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2017 10:54 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: TN
- Contact:
Re: ITT Post Your Random Thoughts
I have always wondered what Bill Watterson must think of the advent of webcomics. They represent freedom from the syndicate, both in terms of formatting requirements and in pressure on him to authorize merchandise.
- Mr. Big
- いいんですよ
- Posts: 931
- Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2017 11:00 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Tennessee
- Contact:
Re: ITT Post Your Random Thoughts
Irony is, these days webcomics has to be even more flexible in order to be "seen", especially since they have to be mobile friendly on social media. Like if you want a comic to be readable on Instagram, you would need to post them one panel at a time (preferably square-shaped panels).
- everything's a little bit weird now
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:52 pm
- Location: at soup
- Contact:
Re: ITT Post Your Random Thoughts
Interesting. I'm not aware of any other strips that used Pogo's layout. It seems like the most inconvenient way you could possibly go about it, and doesn't really give the layout editor any more options than the Calvin and Hobbes format (which just divided the middle row clean in half) did. Less inconvenient was the way strips like Peanuts and Garfield handled it, which was to have mandatory divisions at the two-thirds mark on the first two rows, and then at the one-third mark on the last row. To fit these into a wider format, the second panel had to be doubly-superfluous, allowing whatever was going on in the top row to make sense without it. For example, I'll just grab the first one that comes up on Google Image Search:
...and futz around with it a bit in Photoshop.
I'm...not sure why the top row is taller than the others, but there you go. Roughly the same aspect ratio as the rejiggered Pogo strip, but not quite.
I do wonder why anyone would agree to the ridiculous limitations put on Arnold when no other strip would have been printed that way. Leverage for getting newspapers to buy a comic that was viewed as unmarketable, maybe? There's also the unique case of Crankshaft and Funky Winkerbean, which in "full size" are only two rows, the entire top of which can be removed. I've never seen it printed that way, though. In fact, a good bit of the time Funky Winkerbean will be drawn as a single giant panel instead.
...and futz around with it a bit in Photoshop.
I'm...not sure why the top row is taller than the others, but there you go. Roughly the same aspect ratio as the rejiggered Pogo strip, but not quite.
I do wonder why anyone would agree to the ridiculous limitations put on Arnold when no other strip would have been printed that way. Leverage for getting newspapers to buy a comic that was viewed as unmarketable, maybe? There's also the unique case of Crankshaft and Funky Winkerbean, which in "full size" are only two rows, the entire top of which can be removed. I've never seen it printed that way, though. In fact, a good bit of the time Funky Winkerbean will be drawn as a single giant panel instead.
Every jumbled pile of person has a thinking part that wonders what the part that isn't thinking isn't thinking of...
- Mr. Big
- いいんですよ
- Posts: 931
- Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2017 11:00 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Tennessee
- Contact:
Re: ITT Post Your Random Thoughts
I've seen a few strips that did a layout similar to "Pogo", although it wasn't common. I think it was limited to only two syndicates: Publishers-Hall Syndicate (which syndicated "Pogo") and Register and Tribune Syndicate. As you pointed out, it was super inconvenient, which is probably why not many did it.
"Garfield" used to have a layout similar to "Arnold" during its early years, but Jim Davis later switched to the layout used in "Peanuts". Here's an early example:
"Tiger" by Bud Blake was another strip that did this. My newspaper actually did take off the first panels in each row when they ran the strip on Sundays, so the practice was definitely used in some papers. However, I've never encountered any paper that cropped "Arnold" like that when searching through newspaper archives; quite a few even ran the title panel (which was the same every week anyway). But the strip never ran in that many papers anyway.
I have seen a couple of papers that did take out the top row with the Tom Batiuk strips (it was more common with "Crankshaft", which is probably why "Funky Winkerbean" sometimes did one giant panel) but that's rare. That format, really, just makes the Sunday strip a glorified daily, maybe printed slightly bigger. Another comic that did that format was "Conchy" by James Childress.
"Garfield" used to have a layout similar to "Arnold" during its early years, but Jim Davis later switched to the layout used in "Peanuts". Here's an early example:
"Tiger" by Bud Blake was another strip that did this. My newspaper actually did take off the first panels in each row when they ran the strip on Sundays, so the practice was definitely used in some papers. However, I've never encountered any paper that cropped "Arnold" like that when searching through newspaper archives; quite a few even ran the title panel (which was the same every week anyway). But the strip never ran in that many papers anyway.
I have seen a couple of papers that did take out the top row with the Tom Batiuk strips (it was more common with "Crankshaft", which is probably why "Funky Winkerbean" sometimes did one giant panel) but that's rare. That format, really, just makes the Sunday strip a glorified daily, maybe printed slightly bigger. Another comic that did that format was "Conchy" by James Childress.
- Mr. Big
- いいんですよ
- Posts: 931
- Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2017 11:00 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Tennessee
- Contact:
Re: ITT Post Your Random Thoughts
Talking about all this, it just highlights how headache-inducing planning a Sunday strip used to be Weirdly, there's a bit more freedom today. You get 1/3 format and you can do however you want with it.
- Bigdog
- implied
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 12:26 pm
Re: ITT Post Your Random Thoughts
had anyone considered the alternative approach of beating newspaper editors into submission with a rubber hose
- Weird Autumn
- Party with the kids who wanna party with you
- Posts: 262
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:59 am
- Gender: Female
- Location: Philadelphia
- Contact:
- Mr. Big
- いいんですよ
- Posts: 931
- Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2017 11:00 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Tennessee
- Contact:
- everything's a little bit weird now
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:52 pm
- Location: at soup
- Contact:
Re: ITT Post Your Random Thoughts
That explains why the first two Sunday treasuries have uneven layouts! I'd completely forgotten about that.
Something else I forgot to bring up: Blondie currently uses the same Sunday format as Peanuts, though usually they just divide it up into nine equal-sized panels (which is handy for publishers that want a strip they can stack down the side). However, I once found a Sunday comic section from 1980 where it was a whopping 12 panels, like this:
I guess being one of the oldest comics in print gives you some clout. And no, I'm pretty sure I don't still have that paper although I also have no idea who got rid of it and when.
Every jumbled pile of person has a thinking part that wonders what the part that isn't thinking isn't thinking of...
- Mr. Big
- いいんですよ
- Posts: 931
- Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2017 11:00 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Tennessee
- Contact:
Re: ITT Post Your Random Thoughts
Oh yeah, Blondie Sundays used to have an insane number of panels like that. You can still rearrange to different formats to fit a desired layout as well.
There's another way you can layout the format similar to Peanuts: for the top row, divide at one-third mark, with the first panel being a title panel you can reuse. That way, when you rearrange the panels for the 1/4 format you can take the title panel out and use both throwaway panels. You then add a little vertical box with the strip's name on the side.
Here's an example with "Hagar the Horrible":
I used to have a book "Your Career in Comics", which was all about the newspaper comic business, and they listed every single possible layouts for Sunday comics at the time. I might still have the book in the attic. Should dig it out.
There's another way you can layout the format similar to Peanuts: for the top row, divide at one-third mark, with the first panel being a title panel you can reuse. That way, when you rearrange the panels for the 1/4 format you can take the title panel out and use both throwaway panels. You then add a little vertical box with the strip's name on the side.
Here's an example with "Hagar the Horrible":
I used to have a book "Your Career in Comics", which was all about the newspaper comic business, and they listed every single possible layouts for Sunday comics at the time. I might still have the book in the attic. Should dig it out.
- Mr. Big
- いいんですよ
- Posts: 931
- Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2017 11:00 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Tennessee
- Contact:
Re: ITT Post Your Random Thoughts
This one is for weekday strips, but I thought I'd mention it
On the first panel, the dialogues are always indented like that, seemingly for no reason. This was so, if a newspaper wanted to stack as many strips as possible in a single page, they can add the title in that empty space. Like this (using Photoshop):
This is especially noticeable in "Peanuts" because, for a long time, the strip's title was printed directly on the strip in the top left corner (current reruns remove the title in the corner).
On the first panel, the dialogues are always indented like that, seemingly for no reason. This was so, if a newspaper wanted to stack as many strips as possible in a single page, they can add the title in that empty space. Like this (using Photoshop):
This is especially noticeable in "Peanuts" because, for a long time, the strip's title was printed directly on the strip in the top left corner (current reruns remove the title in the corner).
- everything's a little bit weird now
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:52 pm
- Location: at soup
- Contact:
Re: ITT Post Your Random Thoughts
Thought for the day: If Tumblr's userbase had known the site was only worth $3 million, they probably could have crowdfunded a buyout of their own and turned it into a nonprofit thing.
Every jumbled pile of person has a thinking part that wonders what the part that isn't thinking isn't thinking of...
- everything's a little bit weird now
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:52 pm
- Location: at soup
- Contact:
Re: ITT Post Your Random Thoughts
Every jumbled pile of person has a thinking part that wonders what the part that isn't thinking isn't thinking of...
- ToastGhost
- Big adventure's waiting.
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 7:23 pm
- Gender: Male
- Mr. Big
- いいんですよ
- Posts: 931
- Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2017 11:00 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Tennessee
- Contact:
Re: ITT Post Your Random Thoughts
I'm curious, how many people here knew that "Rugrats" had a newspaper strip? My local paper used it run it when it was around (the strip ran 1998-2003).
- ToastGhost
- Big adventure's waiting.
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 7:23 pm
- Gender: Male
Re: ITT Post Your Random Thoughts
Yeah, used to be in the Washington Post.
Like most Rugrats things, it was bad.
Like most Rugrats things, it was bad.
- Mr. Big
- いいんですよ
- Posts: 931
- Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2017 11:00 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Tennessee
- Contact:
Re: ITT Post Your Random Thoughts
I was thinking about it because THERE ARE STILL PAPERS RERUNNING THE STRIP. Like, not very many (the strip never had a big list of newspapers to begin with), but there's still like 3-4 papers rerunning the comic.
I'm just wondering why? The strip didn't run very long and the TV show has been off the air for ages by now. At least "Peanuts" has 50 years worth of materials.
While I'm at it, "Dr. Katz" had a comic strip as well around the same time, although that one's not being rerun. I think even fewer papers ran that strip.
I'm just wondering why? The strip didn't run very long and the TV show has been off the air for ages by now. At least "Peanuts" has 50 years worth of materials.
While I'm at it, "Dr. Katz" had a comic strip as well around the same time, although that one's not being rerun. I think even fewer papers ran that strip.
- CorvusCaw
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 10:39 pm
- Gender: Female
Re: ITT Post Your Random Thoughts
Cheaper to license than other strips?
- Mr. Big
- いいんですよ
- Posts: 931
- Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2017 11:00 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Tennessee
- Contact:
Re: ITT Post Your Random Thoughts
I guess Nickelodeon really need that syndication money
- Bigdog
- implied
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 12:26 pm
Re: ITT Post Your Random Thoughts
so is your posting a rugrats thing or is that unrelatedToastGhost wrote: ↑Mon Sep 02, 2019 12:07 amYeah, used to be in the Washington Post.
Like most Rugrats things, it was bad.
- Skipper
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2019 5:01 am
- Location: Between my ears
Re: ITT Post Your Random Thoughts
Lol damn
- ToastGhost
- Big adventure's waiting.
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 7:23 pm
- Gender: Male
- Princess Flufflebutt
- Nya
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 2:23 am
- Gender: Female
- DaikatunaRevengeance
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2019 8:28 am
- Gender: Female
- Location: FLAVATOWN
- DaikatunaRevengeance
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2019 8:28 am
- Gender: Female
- Location: FLAVATOWN